Instagram Scheduling Comparison
If you’re choosing between Buffer and Later, you’re likely trying to answer one practical question: which tool reliably schedules the Instagram formats that matter now—Reels, Stories, and carousels—without extra busywork. This guide compares Buffer vs Later specifically for Instagram scheduling and when a third option is a better fit.

| Feature | Buffer | Later |
|---|---|---|
| Schedule Instagram Reels | Yes (publishing options vary by setup) | Yes (auto-publishing supported) |
| Schedule Instagram Stories | Automatic or Notify Me options | Scheduling + publishing; desktop-based workflow noted |
| Schedule Instagram Carousels | Yes (auto-publish supported) | Yes (auto-posting supported) |
| Visual feed planner | Limited compared to Later | Strong Visual Planner positioning |
| Link in bio tool | Not a core Buffer feature | Core Later feature |
| Pricing model | Per-channel pricing (Essentials $5/channel annually) | Plan-based pricing with Social Sets |
Note: Later defines a Social Set as one of each supported profile type (Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Pinterest, LinkedIn, YouTube, Threads, Snapchat) on their pricing page.
This page focuses on Instagram scheduling for Reels, Stories, and carousels—not full community management, listening, or enterprise governance. Instagram publishing is affected by Meta API limitations, so any tool may require notification-based workflows depending on post type and account permissions.
Buffer is known for being simple, stable, and approachable. Buffer explicitly markets scheduling Instagram posts, reels, and stories, and its help docs explain Automatic vs Notify Me workflows for publishing.
Later positions itself as an Instagram-first planner that expanded into a broader social suite. Later highlights bulk scheduling for posts, carousels, Stories, and Reels, with a strong Visual Planner workflow.
Both tools support Reels scheduling. Later tends to feel more Instagram-specialized, while Buffer focuses on simple, functional scheduling. If you want to plan the whole feed, Later often feels better.
Buffer provides flexible Auto-Publish and Notify Me workflows. Later supports Stories scheduling and notes desktop-based constraints. Buffer has an edge on flexibility, Later on visual planning.
Both Buffer and Later support carousel scheduling with auto-publishing. This is effectively a tie.
Later wins for aesthetic planning because it is built around Visual Planner workflows. Buffer’s grid preview is more limited.
Later positions Link in Bio as a core feature area, while Buffer does not.
Buffer is lean and minimal; Later is more suite-like. Pick Buffer for a lighter workflow or Later for a more Instagram-centric suite.
Buffer uses per-channel pricing: $5/month per channel billed annually (Essentials). Later is plan-based with Social Sets and add-ons; Starter is commonly listed at $18.75/month on annual billing, with higher monthly equivalents.
If your main goal is to create content faster and schedule it without paying for a full suite, PostQuickAI offers AI-assisted creation with scheduling and a visual calendar. It’s a strong alternative for creators and SMBs who don’t need enterprise-level suites.
Not universally. Both support scheduling those formats, but Later is stronger for visual planning and suite workflows, while Buffer is better for a simple, flexible scheduler with notification and auto-publish options.
They can support Stories scheduling, but auto-publish depends on Instagram account type and API permissions. Some setups require notification-based posting, and Later notes Stories scheduling constraints in its help documentation.
Buffer can be cheaper for a small number of channels because it prices per channel (Essentials starts at $5/channel/month billed annually). Later is plan-based with Social Sets and add-ons, and Starter is often listed around $18.75/month on annual pricing.
Yes. If the reason you are comparing Buffer vs Later is to reduce time spent creating posts, PostQuickAI can be a better fit because it combines AI-assisted creation with scheduling in one flow.
If you’re choosing between Buffer and Later, you’re probably trying to answer one practical question:
“Which tool will reliably schedule the Instagram formats that actually matter now—Reels, Stories, and carousels—without adding busywork?”
This guide compares Buffer vs Later specifically for Instagram scheduling, including where each one wins—and when a third option (PostQuickAI) can be a better fit if your priority is AI-assisted creation + scheduling at a simpler price.
Quick Verdict: - Choose Later if you want a visual-first Instagram workflow, a strong Visual Planner, and Later’s broader “marketing suite” features (e.g., Link in Bio and creator/UGC-oriented tooling depending on plan). - Choose Buffer if you want a simple, reliable scheduler with flexible Instagram publishing options and you like Buffer’s straightforward approach. - If you’re mainly trying to create faster and schedule IG content in one flow, PostQuickAI is often the better “all-in-one” alternative (especially for creators/SMBs who don’t need enterprise-level suites).
| Feature | Buffer | Later |
|---|---|---|
| Schedule Instagram Reels | ✅ Yes (publishing options vary by setup) | ✅ Yes (Later supports scheduling + auto-publishing for Reels) |
| Schedule Instagram Stories | ✅ Yes (Automatic or “Notify me” options) | ✅ Yes (Later supports scheduling & publishing Stories; Stories scheduling is desktop-based per Later Help Center) |
| Schedule Instagram Carousels | ✅ Yes (auto-publish supported) | ✅ Yes (Later supports auto-posting carousels) |
| Visual feed planner / grid preview | ⚠️ Limited compared to Later’s visual-first approach | ✅ Strong “Visual Planner” positioning (preview + plan aesthetically) |
| Link in bio tool | ⚠️ Not a core Buffer product feature | ✅ Link in Bio is a core Later feature area |
| Pricing model | Per-channel pricing (Essentials starts at $5/channel/mo billed annually on Buffer’s pricing page) | Plan-based pricing with “Social Sets” (Later’s pricing page lists Starter/Growth/Scale and add-ons; annual pricing shown as $18.75/mo for Starter in search snippet from Later pricing page) |
| Best for | Simple scheduling across channels; “keep it lean” | Instagram-first creators/brands who want visual planning + suite features |
Notes on terminology: Later’s pricing uses “Social Sets”. Later defines a Social Set as including one of each supported profile type (Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Pinterest, LinkedIn, YouTube, Threads, Snapchat) on their pricing page.
This page focuses on Instagram scheduling for Reels, Stories, and carousels—not full community management, listening, or enterprise governance.
Also, Instagram publishing is affected by Instagram/Meta API limitations. Any tool may sometimes require a notification-based workflow (instead of pure auto-publish) depending on post type, account type (Business/Creator), permissions, and API changes.
Buffer is known for being simple, stable, and approachable. Buffer explicitly markets that you can “Schedule Instagram posts, reels, and stories” and provides supporting help docs for Instagram publishing workflows.
Later positions itself as an Instagram-first planner that has expanded into a broader social media suite. On Later’s Instagram scheduler page, Later explicitly highlights the ability to bulk schedule Instagram posts, carousels, Stories, and Reels.
Based on review platform snippets (e.g., G2/Trustpilot listings surfaced in search results), common negatives include: - Media formatting/compression issues (some users report video/Reels handling friction). - Support/bug frustrations (a common complaint pattern on public review sites). - Pricing complexity as you add social sets/users/credits (Later’s pricing page lists add-ons like extra Social Sets, extra users, and extra AI credits).
Buffer - Buffer supports scheduling Reels and (depending on workflow) either auto-publish or notification-based posting. - Buffer’s help center includes guidance on scheduling Instagram posts/reels/stories and explains “Automatic” vs notification workflows.
Later - Later has a dedicated help article for Schedule & Publish Instagram Reels, indicating Reels can be scheduled and auto-published when using Auto Publish. - Later’s Instagram scheduler page also highlights Reels as a supported format.
Winner: Tie, but with nuance
Both do Reels scheduling. Later tends to feel more “Instagram-specialized,” while Buffer tends to feel more “simple and functional.” If you care about planning the whole IG feed, Later usually feels better.
Buffer - Buffer supports scheduling Stories and describes options that can include Automatic publishing or Notify me workflows.
Later - Later has a help article for Schedule & Publish Instagram Stories and notes constraints such as Stories scheduling being desktop-based (per the Later Help Center snippet shown in search results). - Depending on account/API status, Stories scheduling may still involve constraints (true for most tools, not unique to Later).
Winner: Slight edge to Buffer for flexibility, Later for visual planning
If you want the most flexible “publish method” options, Buffer is strong. If you want Stories as part of an Instagram-first planning workflow, Later is strong.
Buffer - Buffer states you can schedule carousel posts and (on Buffer’s Instagram page) answers that carousel posts can be published automatically.
Later - Later markets auto-posting for carousels on its Instagram scheduler page (and in related auto-post messaging).
Winner: Tie
Both handle carousels well for most creators/businesses.
Buffer - Buffer supports Instagram scheduling, but it’s not primarily a “grid aesthetic” planner.
Later - Later has a dedicated Visual Planner positioning and multiple pages/help docs around previewing and visually planning your Instagram feed.
Winner: Later
If your brand relies on feed aesthetics (creators, fashion, beauty, hospitality, product brands), Later’s visual planning is a meaningful advantage.
Buffer - Not a core Buffer scheduling differentiator.
Later - Later’s product pages clearly include Link in Bio as a main feature area, and Later has plan-based documentation around link-in-bio capabilities.
Winner: Later
If you want scheduling + link-in-bio under one roof, Later is built for that.
Buffer - Generally perceived as clean and minimal—good if you want fewer moving parts.
Later - More “suite-like,” which can be a benefit (more features) or a downside (more complexity) depending on your needs.
Winner: Depends
- Choose Buffer if you want lean + simple.
- Choose Later if you want an Instagram-oriented suite workflow.
Pricing changes, so below are the structures and verified starting points from official pricing pages and reputable listings surfaced in search results.
Practical takeaway: - If you only manage a small number of accounts, Buffer’s per-channel pricing can be very cost-effective. - If you want a more Instagram-first suite (Visual Planner + Link in Bio + analytics areas), Later may justify the higher base cost—especially if you’re using those extras daily.
You’ll prefer Buffer if you: - Want a simple scheduler for IG posts + Reels + Stories without a heavy suite feel - Like the idea of choosing auto-publish vs notification workflows - Only manage a few channels and want predictable per-channel pricing - Don’t need a deep visual grid planner or link-in-bio system inside the tool
You’ll prefer Later if you: - Care about visual planning (grid preview / aesthetic feed building) - Want a more Instagram-centric workflow, not just “pick a time and post” - Like having Link in Bio and scheduling in the same ecosystem - Don’t mind plan-based pricing and potentially paying more for a fuller suite
If your real goal is: “Create content faster + schedule it (including Reels and carousels) without paying for a big suite”, consider PostQuickAI.
PostQuickAI is built around AI-assisted content creation + scheduling, plus planning features like a visual calendar and “streak” style consistency tracking (as described on PostQuickAI pages).
Not universally. Both support scheduling those formats, but the better choice depends on your workflow: - Choose Later if you want visual planning + suite features (especially grid planning and link-in-bio). - Choose Buffer if you want a simple scheduler with flexible publishing workflows and minimal complexity.
They can support Stories scheduling, but “auto-publish” can depend on Instagram API/account requirements and the exact workflow you set (some setups require notifications). Later’s help documentation notes Stories scheduling constraints (including desktop-based scheduling).
It depends on scale: - Buffer can be cheaper for a small number of channels because it’s priced per channel (Essentials starts at $5/channel/mo billed annually on Buffer’s pricing page). - Later is plan-based with Social Sets and add-ons; the pricing page shows Starter at $18.75/mo (appears annual billing), with monthly pricing often higher depending on billing cycle/region.
Yes—especially if the reason you’re comparing Buffer vs Later is to reduce time spent creating posts. If you want AI-assisted creation + scheduling in one flow, PostQuickAI may be a better fit than paying for a broader suite.